Bad name, hell even the acronym sucks (wpss), but still yesterdays unveiling of the all new windows mobile operating system has sent shockwaves through the internet.
Like Palm, Microsoft has started from scratch, said goodbye to legacy apps and designed a mobile operating system for the future.
The cynic in me just sees that they’ve taken the Zune HD interface and whacked a phone onto it, but even if that’s the case its still one sexy looking device:
Compare that to the iPhone and Cupertino’s wonder phone looks, well….old.
Time will tell if that minimalism will help or hinder but it demonstrates the break that Microsoft has made with the past.
I’ve showed this to my colleagues:
It’s a briefcase containing the following:
- MacBook Pro
- Video Camera
- Digital camera
- iPhone Dock
It also has:
A one socket charging solution that means with one cable you can charge all of the devices inside! Very impressive kit!
So we got to thinking what would we change? This is what we came up with:
- Pico Projector & projection screen
- Video Camera
- Digital camera
- Digital recorder
What would you put in your E-Learning Briefcase?
Come dear reader to a wonderful world, free of the cuts of the impending recession, where optimism and hope are abundant!!!
That’s right kids, its time to purchase a one way ticket to imagineering land!
And guess what, this isn’t another gosh, gee whizz isn’t the iPad amazing!!! type post (I think three is enough for now), this topic is about creating the best device for education, the device needs to be able to handle the following:
- Suitable for multiple users of all ages and abilities (inc users with a visual/physical impairment)
- Wireless connection
- Ability to connect to remote storage
- 5 hr + battery life
- Reasonable horsepower
Apart from that, the world is your oyster, comment or tweet me
Edit sketched out some thing on my notepad:
Continuing on from my previous post about the iPad (and its shortfalls), I’ve been thinking about it from another perspective i.e. an educational one (suprising eh?).
The latest buzz in education for the last couple of years has been netbooks moreso than mobile phones , which in the majority of cases are still too clunky and lack sufficient screen estate to make them useful for lessons. However if we look to institutions like ACU (who’s connected program was the first to give students iPhones and iPod touches for educational benefit both in and out of class), we can see that that a device such as an iPhone lends itself well to aiding teaching and learning.
Why does the iPhone succeed where other mobile learning projects have failed? Because its intuitive This is so often overlooked when it comes to e-learning tools, first impressions count, if users (and I’m containing teachers and students within this term) can’t make something work, they’ll drop it and move on.
I’ve tested this myself, give the iPhone to someone who hasn’t used it before and they will know how to use it, as the majority of the controls make sense.
So why has education been so interested in netbooks? They’re certainly attractive:
- Small form factor
- sufficient performance for web and document writing tasks
I am a netbook owner ( for just under two years now), its far better than the Toshiba Satellite A50 it replaced. That is not to say its not without flaws. It’s battery doesn’t last long enough and the screen resolution is annoying, seriously who thought 1024 x 600 would be a good idea? I wouldn’t even classify myself as a power user, all I do on mine is surf the net and download stuff and yet it’s grunt is rarely sufficient for even that, if you are surfing a website/forum with many images or embedded videos you soon start to experience slow down.
But you can see the benefits, a £200 netbook that can act as an resource locator for lessons is far better than investing £400 in a laptop to do the same thing.
So if we agree that netbooks are great in concept, but flawed in execution why are we giving them to our students? Surely we want to give our students the devices that will enable them to excel?
Because there wasn’t anything better at the time
But I don’t think that this is the case, I now spend probably equal amounts of time at home surfing the net on my iPhone as I do my netbook (that in itself is a major milestone that a mobile device can even compete) and for pure passive information gathering, something like an iPhone is hard to beat.
The main reason I feel the netbooks suffer is that the os (be it Linux or Windows) offers too much functionality. For a device sold and marketed on the principle of giving you quick and easy access to the internet on the go, netbooks don’t really achieve that with any great level of success. A Windows XP install will probably take 1-2gb at a minimum and I would happily say that you could probably do without a lot of it. All that functionality bogs the machine down and makes it harder to achieve its core goal surfing the internet. So it stands to reason that the iPad will probably overtake my netbook as my surfing device of choice because it will do exactly what I need of it, with no bloat, no fuss and no mess.
That’s not to say its perfect (far from it), for students the lack of flash (and thus removing access to the range of e-learning tools & services based on it) and the ability to easily create and store documents (unless file structures etc.. are revealed later on) are thorny issues but I can see that young students will be able to interface better with an interface with a touch screen than a mouse (point and click vs touch).
Regardless of your thoughts on the iPad I think it’s perfect for education as its cheap (relatively), secure, quick to boot and has a decent battery life. It’s ease of use (going on the iPhone interface) means that teachers will spend less time training students on how to use the device and more time using it to support and enhance learning and that’s got to be a good thing right?